RationalWiki’s OCD like obssessions

Ever noticed how RationalWiki has an unhealthy obsession with freaks, kooks, and fanatics?

Ever noticed how they go out and slander people that they don’t agree with?

Well, you’re not alone. Their obsession with bashing religious people as scientifically uneducated and real sugar drinkers as believing in pseudoscience and being swayed by quacks when eating organic foods means that they are not the guard dog of science that they proclaim themselves to be. Science doesn’t need them, as it is not an encyclopedia anyway. It’s just a scare site where people like myself have our blood running stone-cold throughout our veins at this website and its irrational obsessions with

Their articles sound like someone with OCD wrote them. They have targeted conservatives and people who do not Islam as racists and bigots like the KKK for example. Their whole focus on these people is just plain unhealthy and disturbing at the same time. They are not conservative by any means, even though one person out there called them “conservative” They are quite liberal, as evidenced by their labeling of extreme moonbattery and extreme wingnuttery. They try to be centrists, but they end up being far-left because they frequently target conservatives and people concerned about scientific things, like GMO foods or genetically-modified foods that we eat every day that contain all kinds of preservatives and all that to make it taste good from a laboratory, instead of being grown with love, like organic foods are. Organic foods are better in my opinion because they don’t have any of the unhealthy GMO materials in them and they are real food. Real sugar drinks are better for you.

But alas RationalWiki goes after these people labeling them “irrational” and “believing in pseudoscience” the way SPLC goes after people who believe in conspiracy theories and uses such language to discredit and smear their opponents in a sort of amateurish fashion. They use loaded language to describe their opponents and anyone who opposes them. Google has them in their search results as if they are a credible and reliable source, which they are not. They are an opinion page and nothing more than that. They are not rational thinkers, they are people who have an unhealthy obsession with all the bad stuff out there on the internet. It’s disgusting to say the least. It is a disgusting and horrifying obsession. Their obsessions are mostly religious people and creationists and other such people. Creationism is a great thing to believe in because it asserts that God created the Earth and all living things. Although not scientifically valid, it is a widely-held belief among billions of people out there in the world. RationalWiki likes to label these people as gullible and quacks that hate science. They do not represent science at RationalWiki and never will because they are not a trusted and reliable resource for any scientific information and go out bashing with opinion pages about Mythbusters for example as being “blow-up science” for example. The History Channel as being “pseudohistory” because of their standards that they have where they close their ears and eyes and everything is bullshit that they do not agree with. They are very close-minded and intolerant of criticism on their site. I have dealt with them in the past and have debated them. They can be nice people at times, but their obsessions are creepy and disgusting. They are creeps and ultra-fanatical in their beliefs about discrediting all the wackos out there on the web that they do not like, nor care about. They are truly out there, more out there than the galaxy itself.  That is if you want to define it.

Quite simply. Do not use RationalWiki as a source because it is not a source, but an opinion page loaded full of nasty opinions towards those who oppose homosexuality and gay marriage as being “homophobic” and “wrong” They at RationalWiki are the ones that are wrong. Their whole approach is wrong because they have a meter that everything, no matter how valid its points hold up that asserts that everything is bullshit because we said it is and therefore it is. They like to call critics of Islam, Islamophobic because they love Islam because it undermines the Christianity that they hate to death. Their hatred of religious people is unrivaled in my opinion. Their slandering tactics and name-calling need to be opposed and condemned, not praised as scientifically valid. Quite frankly, their obsession is creepy and disgusting. They are a bunch of creeps out there looking to insult anyone that they hate and despise with their loaded labels of pseudohistory for example, for anyone who disagrees with their interpretation of history. This is like a single-minded crusade of theirs to go after quacks and other undesirables in the same way that an eagle goes after a fish. The RationalWiki fools crusade never gets old. Their stupid and idiotic crusade has to stop otherwise it will kill us all. In short, do not believe the RationalWiki fools crusade against those with alternative opinions that do not agree with their distorted view of reality. Do not listen to RationalWiki or any of their baloney! They are full of shit! I have evidence to back this up and no RationalWiki smear job is gonna keep me from writing on this blog. I will simply keep on writing and writing until I feel like it and these clowns can’t stop me, nor will they destroy me. God is what I believe in and He exists within us all, even if science can’t prove or disprove God. RationalWiki’s strident mockery of religion is quite simply an affront to those who believe in Freedom of Religion. If RationalWiki had its way, there would be no freedom of religion and we’d end up like the Soviet Union. That’s all there is to it. RationalWiki is so full of shit it fills up a manure pile. So go ahead, RationalWiki smear me as much as you want to. You won’t last long. God help you for what’s in store for you obnoxious little assholes! Your strident behavior and strident criticism of religion and anyone who does not partake in the consumption of GMO foods or anything not organic and having real sugar for example. Anyone who does not go with GMO foods is a target for ridicule and disgust. Anyone who has legitimate crticisms of modern science is a target for RationalWiki’s strident crusade against those who have differing opinions on certain subjects. RationalWiki is quite simply, an abomination of science and in no way represents science, but rather the narrow beliefs of a few atheists who claim that science is on their side with discrediting God and other strange beliefs, but in reality is not because science cannot interfere with beliefs in religion, nor can religion interfere with science, especially evolution and creation. The evolution/creation pissing contest has gotten quite nasty and quite over the top. They at RationalWiki are over the top and they will find any excuse to pick me apart, like a buzzard picks apart a dead and rotting corpse.

RationalWiki never ceases to amaze me about how strident they are. How fanatical and narrow they are in their beliefs towards those who disagree with modern science and global warming and shilling for the government and all that stuff. RationalWiki is quite simply just another website out there on the internet. Another blog Wiki site that is not reliable, nor trustworthy, just like Conservapedia. Just as strident and just as fanatical in their beliefs and ironically coming from disgruntled Conservapedia types.  They’re just as strident and just as fanatical in their beliefs as Conservapedia is, only in the atheist sense. They are nothing more than a poorly-disguised blog and nothing more.

They are a site with an OCD-like obsession with those that they are disagree with. RationalWiki is irrational and stupid in their crticisms. Don’t be bothered with them. They are nothing but a blog site dressed up as an encyclopedia. They are not an encyclopedia and not really worth anything to science, other than another Wikipedia clone. Don’t be bothered with RationalWiki because they are a stupid and dumb website that ain’t worth your time.

RationalWiki ain’t worth a dime. So don’t worry about it and its stupid crusade against those with alternative opinions that could be valid if tested properly. To hell with RationalWiki and their stupid strident baloney. Don’t be bothered with them.

That’s all I’m gonna say for now at least.

Advertisements

About Justin Royek

I am a critic of Wikipedia that likes to remind people that there are other sources out there than Wikipedia and that knowledge isn't written by a bunch of anonymous nobodies on a blog dressed up as an encyclopedia that Wikipedia is. My name is Justin Royek and this is my personal blog/soapbox for different issues and many things relevant to my life. I am a polyglot that speaks about 10 languages. I am NOT Tim Doner or Benny Lewis or Christophe Clugston or any of those self-proclaimed "polyglots" on YouTube. I am my own blog. I am Justin Edward Royek. Patchman123 on Facebook and YouTube. I am Justin Royek. I AM A WRITER ON MANY ISSUES. I HAVE DECIDED TO CHANGE MY USERNAME ON THE BLOG.
This entry was posted in Histoy. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to RationalWiki’s OCD like obssessions

  1. EGKunz says:

    “Stupid….baloney….shit….manure…” you sling a lot of slander and hate towards this website, yet you qualify none of your claims. You call the website anti-christian and a bunch of “islamophiles” and yet do not provide any proof of your accusations. If you’re going to go on a tirade about a website that you denigrate as being non-factual and horribly biased, you cannot do so without at least trying to prove that you aren’t the one who’s “full of shit!”

    • Well Rationalwiki has an Islamophobia category.
      Try explaining that one. I think you’re the one that’s full of shit. You clearly haven’t seen their articles on the creationists, have you? They are irrational to them. I do not wanna have to go there because they will slander me in the end. They must be Islamophiles because of this Islamophobia category that they have on there. You are just trying to troll me, aren’t you?

      • Jimmy Russels says:

        If you actually read the website, moron, you would know that they make a clear distinction between criticism of Islam and Islamaphobia. Spending five minutes reading the article on Islam would show that they are not the biggest fans of Islam, either.

        http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Islam#Violence_and_human_rights_violations_issues

      • No need to call me names over it. It get it now, Thanks.

      • Ace says:

        @Jimmy Russells

        Well moron, having read the worthless website I’ve concluded that a few paltry attempts to make the site seem “unbiased” like you’re posting below don’t change the fact that the site is complete crap that reads like bad Reddit posts. The site even admits that it’s biased so why try to apologize for it anyway?

        The “Islamophobia” thing is the least of it’s problems anyway. This is a lunatic fringe site which thinks that Richard Dawkins is too “far-right”, and uses sources as bad as “Cracked.com” and “TV Tropes”.

        The worst part is that with the exception of a decent few, the site’s admins are socially inept manchildren who can’t even hold a civil debate on a 3rd grade level – they regularly just remove edits without any warning, and insult or curse at people who try to discuss the edits (in fact you couldn’t even respond to criticism here without hurling “moron”, proving the point).

        Most of the admins behavior would get them banned as trolls, not promoted to admin, on any other website out there, and no one calls them out on it. One of admins in question even stalked a female editor because he had searched out her Twitter and found she made a negative comment about the site and he still has admin privileges on this so called “feminist” site.

        Not to mention the fact that you guys claim the site is “satirical” yet you cult members take it’s laughable “mission” so seriously that you feel the need to troll the comments of any site critical of it.

        The only hope for that cesspool is for the owner to ban 95% of the members, delete everything, and start over from scratch.

    • Ace says:

      @Jimmy Russells

      Well moron, having read the worthless website I’ve concluded that a few paltry attempts to make the site seem “unbiased” like you’re posting below don’t change the fact that the site is complete crap that reads like bad Reddit posts. The site even admits that it’s biased so why try to apologize for it anyway?

      The “Islamophobia” thing is the least of it’s problems anyway. This is a lunatic fringe site which thinks that Richard Dawkins is too “far-right”, and uses sources as bad as “Cracked.com” and “TV Tropes”.

      The worst part is that with the exception of a decent few, the site’s admins are socially inept manchildren who can’t even hold a civil debate on a 3rd grade level – they regularly just remove edits without any warning, and insult or curse at people who try to discuss the edits (in fact you couldn’t even respond to criticism here without hurling “moron”, proving the point).

      Most of the admins behavior would get them banned as trolls, not promoted to admin, on any other website out there, and no one calls them out on it. One of admins in question even stalked a female editor because he had searched out her Twitter and found she made a negative comment about the site and he still has admin privileges on this so called “feminist” site.

      Not to mention the fact that you guys claim the site is “satirical” yet you cult members take it’s laughable “mission” so seriously that you feel the need to troll the comments of any site critical of it.

      The only hope for that cesspool is for the owner to ban 95% of the members, delete everything, and start over from scratch.

  2. here’s a comment I left for them on their blog…i’m sure it will be removed:

    Dear RationalWiki,
    Your cynical claims against anyone who points out a validated truth goes to show your website is merely a propaganda website, far from rational or even moderately intelligent. I love skeptics, I am one myself, but you are a skeptic with a clear agenda of mainstream propaganda….perhaps you should turn your skepticism towards the official BS stories we are given as pertaining to some very real conspiracies that are becoming more and more apparent thanks to the information age…..such as JFK, 9-11, vaccines, chemtrails, fluoride and the abundance of alien abductions and sightings [in modern time and throughout history].

    Your purpose is clearly to muddy the waters of information, using ridicule as your primary weapon….which happens to be very effective on the less intuitive. I bet your too chicken s**t to even put your face and name to this shame of a website. I sincerely hope you realize the great disservice you are doing to mankind and put yourself towards more truthful and productive endeavors. Your kids and family have to live in this world too….and its apparently been highjacked by self-entitled psychopaths who are in power. I suggest you begin with seeking the real truths in this world instead of being a purveyor of propaganda.

  3. Jimmy Russels says:

    Sorry for the “moron” part of my comment, but the rest of it still stands. Your attacks against RW are completely unfounded.

  4. eib says:

    I am always suspicious of any person or organization that gives credence to Islamophobia.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s