Wikipedia’s “Fringe Theory” Anti-Intellectual Nonsense

I do not like Wikipedia and its “fringe theory” nonsense that it is spinning, about ridiculing “theories” that it does not like, ridiculing people in their pseudo-intellectual manner that do not think the same way that they do. The fringe theory category is a pile of bullshit to suggest that people whose theories are not accepted by he mainstream, but could be right. Wikipedia wants us to believe that their way of thinking is correct and everyone else’s is wrong and perpetrating the false idea that they represent mainstream thought. They do not and never will and the herd mentality of ridiculing those that think outside the Wikipedia Borg collective as being wrong. This fringe theory crap is more of the usual anti-intellectual psychobabble that is classic Wikipedia that stifles theories outside the mainstream in their snooty arrogance that they wrongly lump into the fringe theory category to suggest that anyone who does not think like they do are fringe theories, like the way Southern Poverty Law Center, ridicules anyone with a thinking brain of believing in conspiracy theories that do not adhere to their way of thinking and the disgusting media industry that ridicules people that do not think like the “mainstream” does, when the “mainstream” of society is obsessed with how big Kim Kardashian’s tits are.

This is sad and disgusting this “fringe theory” category that ridicules thought outside the mainstream that does not adhere to the democratically elected Wikipedia mob as being incorrect, in this anti-intellectual babble that Wikipedia feels are ridiculous and wrong, when only a few think it, just because the “mainstream” does not believe it, does not necessarily mean that it’s wrong or fallacious, but correct in another interpretation of the evidence as seen from a different angle, and this “fringe theory” labeling does not help anything and stifles free thought and free intellectual reasoning by labeling it as “fringe theory” This fringe theory category is nothing but a bunch of anti-intellectual bullshit.

The pseudoarchaeology article is another mockery of people’s cultural beliefs by saying that nationalist archaeology with “nationalist visions” is totally completely wrong, and that bashing of people’s traditional cultures with this nationalism slur in the article category, when in fact archaeology is very much part of a nation’s national identity, telling about how the people of Israel lived before 1,000 BC or around that time or the archaeology of the Israel Antiquities Authority, that preserves these archaeological sites which are of national importance, and nationalism factors into it because nationalism is defined as cenetric to an ethnic group and it factors in because it tells where an ethnic group lived several thousand years ago and helps to foment nationalism  because it giving a sense of identity and part of their culture, these archaeological history, though the Nazi archaeology with the Aryan race nonsense and Wikipedia’s little slur against people’s history that have been formed and the origins of whole peoples and nationalist identities have been formed by archaeology because it tells where

The Nazis were using bad science methods to “prove” the Aryan race, through misguided theories , and that WIkipedia by this labeling is hoping to prevent anothe Nazi Germany or whatever, which they aren’t.  And it obfuscates people’s REAL archaeologicy that is legitimate archaeology that uses legitimate archaeology to pinpoint the origins of whole peoples, like the Croats were created and the archaeology that legitimately preserves the stuff that people hold sacred because of their nationalist identity and the legitimate archaeology to find the  This is part of a national identity to have this archaeology prove the real origins of the people in question and nationalist archaeology is very much a part of it, and disgustingly lumps this in with the bad archaeology of the Nazis and the anti-nationalist, hate patriotism and nation states and mocking people’s national identities crowd that
writes this crap is truly shameful. Nationalism is part of the equation. End of story becuase it is the story of whole peoples and their histories and where they were and telling people “Hey this is where we were and what we were” and it proves the identities and using real archaeological methods to dig up artifacts that form identities and create a sense of nationalistic importance talking about the origins of whole peoples. This nationalist archaeology paragraph is a disgusting piece of crap. I’m sorry, but it is.

As for religious archaeology, well Biblical archaeology is where the whole field of archaeology began trying to prove the origins of the Biblical peoples because the Bible was important and religion is very important because it tells about what cultures believed in several thousand years ago and the impact

Pseudoarchaeology should be used for archaeology that uses improper methods, perpetuates frauds that are not accurate,  does not gather info correct, not an excuse to bash people’s cultures and and religions by pretending to be intellectual. I have yet again

Legitimate archaeology proving the real origins of peoples helps to form nationalist identities because it writes their history and tells about where they came from and creates a real record of where an ethnic group was in the year 1,000 AD and archaeology proves this history that writes the origins of whole ethnic groups. Therefore the pseudoarchaeology article, lumping in this legitimate archaeology in with the Aryan race long-ago debunked theories of looking for something that is not there, and never was, and using improper archaeological methods to find the Aryan race that are loaded with the false beliefs and falsehoods of Nazi pseudoscience that was totally and completely flawed and wrong and falsely using archaeology to prove the origins of the Aryan race, which is not real nationalism anyway, and lumping the bad archaeology of the Nazis, in with the real stuff that uses real methods to find the origins of real people using proper archaeological methods and this legitimate archaeology that forms national identities and real national histories that properly document the origins of whole ethnic groups and the interpretations based on real evidence that form the origins of whole peoples and then bashing the TV shows and improper use of expert opinion to form their own opinions of shows that mislead the public, because the public wants Indiana Jones Archaeology, which is not archaeology at all.

This real archaeology that legitimately forms nationalist identities and uses legitimate methods to find the origins of whole peoples in with the Nazis is anti-intellectual and completely ignorant of all reality.  RationalWiki and Wikipedia, these fake intellectual know it alls would not know reality if it bit them in the ass.

Legitimate nationalist archaeology that proves the real origins of ethnic groups and whole peoples using legitimate methods and legitimate science to conclusively prove the origins of whole people, ideology factors into it because it’s their ethnic group being documented here and using legitimate and real archaeological methods to document the real historical record, that subsequently forms nationalist ideas that are real and legitimate is not pseudoarchaeology and lumping it in with the Nazis bad archaeology is sloppy, ignorant, and totally wrong.

wikipedia can never get its facts straight because it’s written by a mob of nobodies that are not experts in any field that they claim to be and therefore Wikipedia is a joke that

selectively cherry-picks opinions to prove their own stupid crap and their own wrong and arrogant ideas for their own self-serving and idiotic gains and blasphemy of mainstream academia when half the users aren’t mainstream academics or experts in a particular field, therefore the pseudoarchaeology articles and all that should be taken as a joke because it’s written by non-experts.
Wikipedia is a joke along with RationalWiki and all the other skewed Wikipedia agenda sites like Conservapedia, so do not use them at all.


Wikipedia is crap.



About Justin Royek

I am a critic of Wikipedia that likes to remind people that there are other sources out there than Wikipedia and that knowledge isn't written by a bunch of anonymous nobodies on a blog dressed up as an encyclopedia that Wikipedia is. My name is Justin Royek and this is my personal blog/soapbox for different issues and many things relevant to my life. I am a polyglot that speaks about 10 languages. I am NOT Tim Doner or Benny Lewis or Christophe Clugston or any of those self-proclaimed "polyglots" on YouTube. I am my own blog. I am Justin Edward Royek. Patchman123 on Facebook and YouTube. I am Justin Royek. I AM A WRITER ON MANY ISSUES. I HAVE DECIDED TO CHANGE MY USERNAME ON THE BLOG.
This entry was posted in History. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s